PK Kemsley’s finances are once again at the center of his divorce battle with estranged wife Dorit Kemsley as they fight over spousal and child support.
The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star, 50, filed new documents in their legal case, which included a certified public accountant’s declaration of the music manager’s income and spending habits.
According to the declaration dated July 30 and exclusively obtained by Us, Aaron Garrett, who was hired by Dorit’s legal team, alleged that PK, 58, “borrowed $350,000 in November 2024 which was due to be repaid in November 2025.”
Garrett noted that “based on the documentation received to date, it does not appear that this alleged loan was repaid.” He also stated that PK allegedly has $821,937 in unknown deposits that the British businessman has asserted are loans.
PK Kemsley, Dorit Kemsley Charles Sykes/Bravo/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images
“PK represents that he has received loans in the post-separation period. We have not received documentation reflecting the repayment of these alleged loans,” the documents filed in court on Tuesday, August 4, read. “The other inflows that PK characterizes as ‘loans’ are inbound transfers and deposits received from international and domestic accounts, which we have not received statements for. It is unclear if these funds were received from accounts in PKs name (which he has not disclosed), third parties, or business entities. We further note that PK does not disclose any outstanding obligations in his updated Income and Expense Declaration, nor has he produced documentation supporting the same. We have attributed these inflows to PK as income pending documentation supporting the obligations or repayment.”
The forensic accountant also declared that PK has withdrawn over $100,000 in cash over the last two years and spent “approximately $435,000 on travel and dining” since moving out of their marital home.
“Dorit has not received child or spousal support since the date of separation. Since vacating the residence, PK has spent the majority of his time abroad and lived a lavish lifestyle,” Garrett claimed, while supporting Dorit’s monthly demand for $21,086 in child support and an additional $22,330 in spousal support. The Bravolebrity further claims that PK “has assumed little responsibility for the children’s day-to-day care,” leaving her to “shoulder virtually all parenting responsibilities.”
Her CPA found that PK’s “income for the 24 months ending March 31, 2026 is at least $3,869,620” and Dorit’s annual income is $548,970. (Her RHOBH salary was included but redacted in the paperwork.)
Us reached out to both parties’ lawyers for comment.
Paul “PK” Kemsley fired back at estranged wife Dorit Kemsley’s claims that her contract for The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills can explain her so-called “excessive” spending habits. “Her contract does not state any requirement to update and maintain her wardrobe, make up and hair as a condition for her employment,” PK, 58, alleged in […]
PK and Dorit have been at war since April 2025 when she filed for divorce after 10 years of marriage. She cited “irreconcilable differences” as the reason behind their split and asked a judge to award her sole legal and physical custody of their two children: son Jagger, 12, and daughter Phoenix, 9.
PK has slammed Dorit for allegedly spending $1 million on designer goods for RHOBH and claiming she takes care of their kids 95 percent of the time. Dorit denied the spending claim, stating that she returned some of the items. In her declaration, however, the reality star revealed she spent $217,000 on her season 15 wardrobe.
Meanwhile, the exes aren’t just fighting over custody and support.
Dorit and PK are also at odds over their once-shared home, which she and their children have occupied since their split in May 2024.
She accused PK of failing to pay the mortgage on their residence, despite allegedly promising to do so, resulting in foreclosure notices.
PK has expressed his desire to sell the home, arguing that an immediate, court-ordered sale of the property is necessary to preserve the remaining equity in the home. Dorit asked the judge to deny his request.
In court documents filed last month, Dorit claimed her estranged husband is attempting to “egregiously misuse Family Code 2108” in an attempt to “side-step trial” and continue to allegedly forgo making their mortgage payments. She argued that his actions would “render his wife and children homeless.”
